Introduction: The fatal mistake that costs millions

3:42 a.m. Your CISO wakes you up. “We’re under attack. This is serious.”

You rush to the office. 45-minute journey minimum. Meanwhile, the attack progresses, systems fall one by one, and your team awaits instructions in a crisis room… empty.

When you finally arrive in the crisis room, it’s chaos: the CIO is shouting on the phone to a service provider, the communications manager doesn’t know what to say to the journalists who are already calling in, and no one knows who has to make THE critical decision: shut down the servers or try to save them?

The death trap: While you were running to your “physical war room”, cybercriminals had already exfiltrated 73% of your critical data. The race was lost before it had even begun.

This scene is repeated in 47% of French companies every year. But it’s not the cyberattack that’s killing them. It’s the inability to effectively coordinate their crisis unit when every second counts.

According to the CESIN 2025 barometer, a terrifying gap exists: 72% of companies say they are prepared to detect a cyber attack, but only 54% know how to respond effectively. This 18-point difference? That’s exactly the percentage of companies that have not prepared their collaborative crisis unit.

The brutal truth: Your antivirus won’t save you. Neither will your firewalls. What will make the difference between survival and catastrophe is your ability to orchestrate a collaborative response in 15 minutes flat.

The 4 fatal errors of collaboration in a cyber crisis

Mistake #1: “We have a crisis room, we’ll improvise when the time comes”.

Real consequences: 45 minutes lost minimum + Critical reaction times (IBM Cost of a Data Breach Report 2025: 241 days on average to detect an intrusion, but only a few hours to contain it once detected).

Your beautiful crisis room on the 15th floor? Useless at 3 a.m. when your decision-makers are at home, in bed, at least 45 minutes away by car. While your CEO crosses Paris in his pyjamas under his coat, the hackers are quietly piloting your servers from their sofa.

Brutal reality: when attack strikes, stress impairs judgment. With no pre-established collaborative protocol AND remote access, every decision becomes a bottleneck as hackers extend their reach.

Mistake #2: “Everyone must be consulted”.

Real consequences: Increased reaction times when every minute counts

In crisis, consensus kills. Literally. While you’re holding your 4th meeting to “get everyone in line”, criminals are making inroads into your systems. The CESIN 2025 barometer shows that the most effective companies have clear and rapid decision-making processes.

Mistake #3: “Our IT expert handles everything”.

Real consequence: According to the CESIN 2025 barometer, cyber crises have a multi-disciplinary impact, requiring cross-disciplinary coordination.

Your technical expert is a genius… at talking to machines. But when France 2 breaks into your reception area, who’s in charge? When your customers panic about X, who responds? Technology is only part of the problem in a cyber crisis.

Error #4: “We use WhatsApp to coordinate”.

Real consequences: Loss of critical information and lack of traceability (feedback from the field).

WhatsApp, Slack, emails… In a crisis, information gets lost in a chaos of notifications. Decisions are made without the right people being in the loop. The result? Contradictory actions that make the situation worse.

The solution that turns chaos into victory: Crisis RACI

The secret of companies that survive cyber attacks

The most successful organizations all have one thing in common: they use the RACI framework to structure their collaborative crisis teams.

RACI = Responsible, Accountable, Consulted, Informed

But beware: 99% of companies misapply RACI in crisis situations. Here’s how the 1% make the difference:

✅ Crisis RACI: 4 roles, 0 confusion

R – Responsible: The one who does

  • SOC Analyst → Technical analysis of the attack
  • Responsable com → Writes the press release
  • IT expert → Performs remediation

A – Accountable: The one who makes the final decision

  • CISO → Decides on containment strategy
  • DG → Validates external communication
  • DSI → Approves technical actions

C – Consulted: The one we listen to

  • Legal → Advises on legal obligations
  • Business → Inform on business impacts
  • Insurer → Guide to the declaration procedure

I – Informed: One who knows

  • Comex → Receives status updates
  • HR → Knows the impact on teams
  • Finance → Tracking the costs of the crisis

📊 The benefits of a structured RACI approach

Organizations that have implemented structured RACI approaches to crisis management report significant improvements, according to feedback from the field:

  • Significantly reduced reaction time between detection and first action
  • Improved decision-making quality thanks to clear roles
  • Reduce coordination errors and contradictory actions
  • Reduced team stress thanks to clear responsibilities

Sources: Customer feedback and industry studies

PanicSafe: Technology meets crisis psychology

The problem we solved

Our two founders each have 25 years’ experience in cybersecurity. Over a quarter of a century, they have assisted, experienced and sometimes suffered hundreds of crisis cells. The observation was always the same: existing tools do not understand human cognitive mechanisms under stress.

Their 50 years of experience in the field have enabled them to identify a recurring pattern: during a crisis, cognitive abilities deteriorate significantly. Mental workload increases by 300%. Attention spans fragment. Decision-making processes slow down.

Normal” tools become counter-productive.

Our innovation: Optimized cognitive RACI

PanicSafe is the first (and only) platform that integrates discoveries in stress neuroscience to optimize the collaborative crisis cell:

🎯 High-performance interface

  • Intuitive, no-frills interface: Hyper focus on the essentials in crisis situations
  • Multi-support: Accessible from web browser, cell phone, tablet (wherever you are)
  • Ultra-targeted push notifications (no information overload)

⚡ Real-time dynamic RACI

  • Automatic role assignment according to incident type
  • Intelligent escalation if no response in X minutes
  • Direct visibility of tasks: each member instantly sees his or her assigned missions, their priority and progress status.

🎯 Anti-stress workflows

  • Step-by-step checklist (impossible to forget)
  • Pre-written communication templates (no blank pages)
  • Real-time history of who’s doing what (total transparency)

📊 Proof with results

Case study – Industrial group, 2,500 employees :

“Before PanicSafe: chaotic coordination during a ransomware attack, multiple communication channels, widespread stress.

With PanicSafe: controlled coordination for the same type of incident, unified communication, serene teams. The improvement is spectacular.”

  • Jean-Marc D., CISO

Emergency: Why act NOW

The vulnerability window closes

Alarming context 2025 :

  • +47% more attacks according to CESIN barometer – SMEs no longer spared
  • New NIS2 regulations: enhanced crisis management obligations
  • IBM Security 2025 detection time: 241 days on average between intrusion and detection

The question is no longer IF you will be attacked, but WHEN.

The cost of inaction

Scenario 1 – You do nothing :

  • Next crisis = organizational chaos
  • Recovery time: several weeks/months
  • Average cost: €4.45M (IBM Security Report 2024)
  • Reputation impact: significant loss of customer confidence

Scenario 2 – You prepare your collaborative crisis unit now :

  • Next crisis = demonstration of maturity
  • Recovery time: considerably reduced
  • Cost: controlled financial impact
  • Reputation impact: confidence-building (“they’ve got it”)

🎁 Your hidden competitive advantage

Your competitors aren’t reading this article. They don’t know the importance of RACI in a cyber crisis. This is your window of opportunity.

While they’re still improvising their crisis responses, you can become the company that turns its crises into proof of operational excellence.

Conclusion: Your decision for the next 30 seconds

You have 2 choices:

Choice 1: Continue as before. Cross your fingers. Hope that “it happens to everyone else”. Risk chaos in your next crisis.

Choice 2: Take the lead. Structure your collaborative crisis unit. Turn your vulnerability into a competitive advantage.

The difference between these 2 choices? The next 30 seconds of your attention.

Guillaume Poupard, former Director of ANSSI, said it best: “You can’t improvise responses in the middle of a disaster! Preparation, tools and training are essential.”

The final question: Do you want your next crisis to be a catastrophe… or a demonstration of your excellence?

📚 Sources and references

Take action now

Discover how to turn your crises into demonstrations of excellence: Book a demo

End of article

Discover the latest articles

Preview